Loïc Dachary
09368a4993
[BRANDING] lookup .forgejo/workflows before .gitea/workflows
...
(cherry picked from commit ffe51fd72fa2b483b67d2b7d0bbde23027fddbff023f7cc3b295c3a3aa701cc0ef5cc5467d0825685d8f40e8651d268662cc326a0fbcc1
2023-05-16 11:17:53 +02:00
a1012112796
6bff6e3a1f
show workflow config error on file view also ( #24267 )
...
As title, follow #24124
---------
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-04-22 22:16:54 -04:00
Zettat123
5eb4c63867
Support triggering workflows by wiki related events ( #24119 )
...
This PR is to support triggering workflows by wiki related events like
creating, editing or deleting wiki pages. In GitHub, this event is
called
[gollum](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#gollum )
2023-04-17 13:49:47 -04:00
Zettat123
2d91afaa92
Fix mismatch between hook events and github event types ( #24048 )
...
Some workflow trigger events can have multiple activity types, such as
`issues` and `pull_request`, and user can specify which types can
trigger the workflow. See GitHub documentation:
https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows
Now some hook events cannot match the workflow trigger events correctly
because we don't check the activity types. For example,
`pull_request_label` is an individual hook event. But there isn't a
`pull_request_label` workflow trigger event, we can only use
`pull_request` event's `label` activity type. If we don't check the
activity types, the workflows without the `label` activity type may be
triggered by the `pull_request_label` event by mistake. We need to
improve the match logic.
- [x] [`issues`
](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issues )
- [x]
[`issue_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issue_comment )
- [x]
[`pull_request`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request )
- [x]
[`pull_request_review`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review )
- [x]
[`pull_request_review_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review_comment )
- [x]
[`release`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#release )
- [x]
[`registry_package`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#registry_package )
2023-04-12 12:16:47 -04:00
Jason Song
ecf34fcd89
Do not crash when parsing an invalid workflow file ( #23972 )
...
Fix #23658 .
Related to https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/39
2023-04-07 20:12:10 +08:00
Jason Song
964a057a76
Fix checks for needs in Actions ( #23789 )
...
Fix:
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/issues/77
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/issues/81
Before:
<img width="1489" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/228501567-f752cf87-a7ed-42c6-8f3d-ba741795c1fe.png ">
Highlights:
- Upgrade act to make things doable, related to
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/32
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/33
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/35
- Make `needs` works
- Sort jobs in the original order in the workflow files
2023-03-30 22:33:17 +08:00
ChristopherHX
6840258c95
Use GitHub Actions compatible globbing for branches, tag, path filter ( #22804 )
...
Replaces the current globbing library with a
https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions#filter-pattern-cheat-sheet
compatible one.
This adds support for
- `paths-ignore`, `tags-ignore` and `branches-ignore` filters.
- negative patterns in `paths`, `tags` and `branches` filters
- using both `tags` and `paths` filter on the push event
Original PR https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/13 .
nektos/act PR https://github.com/nektos/act/pull/1618 for the
workflowpattern package (It can take some months for it to appear in
https://gitea.com/gitea/act )
Related to https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/13539
2023-03-27 16:27:40 +08:00
Zettat123
e7f0bcf884
Improve workflow event triggers ( #23613 )
...
Follow #23037
Fix [#22598
comment](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22958#issuecomment-1475763042 )
Workflows with `pull_request` trigger event can't be triggered by
`pull_request_sync` event. This PR adds the `canGithubEventMatch`
function to check if a Github event can match any Gitea event. If the
Github event matches a Gitea event, the related workflows should be
triggered.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-03-23 12:04:15 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
8e40634797
Convert GitHub event on actions and fix some pull_request events. ( #23037 )
...
Follow #22680
Partially Fix #22958 , on pull_request, `opened`, `reopened`,
`synchronize` supported, `edited` hasn't been supported yet because
Gitea doesn't trigger that events.
---------
Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
2023-03-14 20:50:51 +08:00
yp05327
aac07d010f
Add workflow error notification in ui ( #23404 )
...
---------
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <matti@mdranta.net>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-03-14 15:27:03 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
368d43643f
Fix actions workflow branches match bug ( #22724 )
...
caused by #22680
`pushPayload.Ref` and `prPayload.PullRequest.Base.Ref` have the format
like `refs/heads/<branch_name>`, so we need to trim the prefix before
comparing.
2023-02-02 20:40:08 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
2871ea0809
Add more events details supports for actions ( #22680 )
...
#21937 implemented only basic events based on name because of `act`'s
limitation. So I sent a PR to parse all possible events details in
https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/11 and it merged. The ref
documentation is
https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows
This PR depends on that and make more detail responses for `push` events
and `pull_request` events. And it lefts more events there for future
PRs.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
2023-02-01 13:32:46 +08:00
Jason Song
4011821c94
Implement actions ( #21937 )
...
Close #13539 .
Co-authored by: @lunny @appleboy @fuxiaohei and others.
Related projects:
- https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-def
- https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-go
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner
### Summary
The target of this PR is to bring a basic implementation of "Actions",
an internal CI/CD system of Gitea. That means even though it has been
merged, the state of the feature is **EXPERIMENTAL**, and please note
that:
- It is disabled by default;
- It shouldn't be used in a production environment currently;
- It shouldn't be used in a public Gitea instance currently;
- Breaking changes may be made before it's stable.
**Please comment on #13539 if you have any different product design
ideas**, all decisions reached there will be adopted here. But in this
PR, we don't talk about **naming, feature-creep or alternatives**.
### ⚠️ Breaking
`gitea-actions` will become a reserved user name. If a user with the
name already exists in the database, it is recommended to rename it.
### Some important reviews
- What is `DEFAULT_ACTIONS_URL` in `app.ini` for?
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1055954954
- Why the api for runners is not under the normal `/api/v1` prefix?
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061173592
- Why DBFS?
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061301178
- Why ignore events triggered by `gitea-actions` bot?
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1063254103
- Why there's no permission control for actions?
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1090229868
### What it looks like
<details>
#### Manage runners
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205870657-c72f590e-2e08-4cd4-be7f-2e0abb299bbf.png ">
#### List runs
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872794-50fde990-2b45-48c1-a178-908e4ec5b627.png ">
#### View logs
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872501-9b7b9000-9542-4991-8f55-18ccdada77c3.png ">
</details>
### How to try it
<details>
#### 1. Start Gitea
Clone this branch and [install from
source](https://docs.gitea.io/en-us/install-from-source ).
Add additional configurations in `app.ini` to enable Actions:
```ini
[actions]
ENABLED = true
```
Start it.
If all is well, you'll see the management page of runners:
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205877365-8e30a780-9b10-4154-b3e8-ee6c3cb35a59.png ">
#### 2. Start runner
Clone the [act_runner](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner ), and follow
the
[README](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/src/branch/main/README.md )
to start it.
If all is well, you'll see a new runner has been added:
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205878000-216f5937-e696-470d-b66c-8473987d91c3.png ">
#### 3. Enable actions for a repo
Create a new repo or open an existing one, check the `Actions` checkbox
in settings and submit.
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879705-53e09208-73c0-4b3e-a123-2dcf9aba4b9c.png ">
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879383-23f3d08f-1a85-41dd-a8b3-54e2ee6453e8.png ">
If all is well, you'll see a new tab "Actions":
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205881648-a8072d8c-5803-4d76-b8a8-9b2fb49516c1.png ">
#### 4. Upload workflow files
Upload some workflow files to `.gitea/workflows/xxx.yaml`, you can
follow the [quickstart](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/quickstart )
of GitHub Actions. Yes, Gitea Actions is compatible with GitHub Actions
in most cases, you can use the same demo:
```yaml
name: GitHub Actions Demo
run-name: ${{ github.actor }} is testing out GitHub Actions 🚀
on: [push]
jobs:
Explore-GitHub-Actions:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- run: echo "🎉 The job was automatically triggered by a ${{ github.event_name }} event."
- run: echo "🐧 This job is now running on a ${{ runner.os }} server hosted by GitHub!"
- run: echo "🔎 The name of your branch is ${{ github.ref }} and your repository is ${{ github.repository }}."
- name: Check out repository code
uses: actions/checkout@v3
- run: echo "💡 The ${{ github.repository }} repository has been cloned to the runner."
- run: echo "🖥️ The workflow is now ready to test your code on the runner."
- name: List files in the repository
run: |
ls ${{ github.workspace }}
- run: echo "🍏 This job's status is ${{ job.status }}."
```
If all is well, you'll see a new run in `Actions` tab:
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884473-79a874bc-171b-4aaf-acd5-0241a45c3b53.png ">
#### 5. Check the logs of jobs
Click a run and you'll see the logs:
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884800-994b0374-67f7-48ff-be9a-4c53f3141547.png ">
#### 6. Go on
You can try more examples in [the
documents](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions )
of GitHub Actions, then you might find a lot of bugs.
Come on, PRs are welcome.
</details>
See also: [Feature Preview: Gitea
Actions](https://blog.gitea.io/2022/12/feature-preview-gitea-actions/ )
---------
Co-authored-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: ChristopherHX <christopher.homberger@web.de>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2023-01-31 09:45:19 +08:00
