- The review type '22' is a general comment type that is attached to
single codecomments, reviews with multiple comments or to simple approve
and request changes comment. This comment can be used to create a link
towards this action on an pull request.
- Adds an anchor to the review comment type, so that when its getting
linked to it, it actually jumps towards that event.
- This also now fixes the behavior that after you created a review you
will be redirected to that review and because this is an general comment
type other mails will also be 'fixed' such as the approved or request changes.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1248
(cherry picked from commit b0c3075a79)
(cherry picked from commit f61505281c)
(cherry picked from commit 1741a5f1fe)
(cherry picked from commit 5ee4cf2ed9)
1. Use `gt-invisible` instead of `invisible`.
2. Use `gt-word-break` instead of `dont-break-out` (there is a slight
different "hyphens", but I think it won't affect too much since it is
only used for the "full name").
3. Remove `.small.button:has(svg)` , now our buttons could layout SVG
correctly, and actually I didn't see this CSS class is used in code.
Each change is tested manually line by line. There are too many changes
so I can't share dozens of screenshots.
In short:
1. `ui right` could be still used in `ui top attached header`, because
there is a special case.
2. A lot of `ui right` are just no-op, so they can be removed safely.
3. Some of the `ui right` should be replaced by `gt-float-right` (to
avoid breaking, leave them to the future).
4. A few of the `ui right` could be rewritten by flex.
Fix#26731
Almost all "tabindex" in code are incorrect.
1. All "input/button" by default are focusable, so no need to use "tabindex=0"
2. All "div/span" by default are not focusable, so no need to use "tabindex=-1"
3. All "dropdown" are focusable by framework, so no need to use "tabindex"
4. Some tabindex values are incorrect (eg: `new_form.tmpl`), so remove them
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
This problem occurs because in #25839, the warning status has been
removed, but there is something in the tmpl that hasn't been changed.
related #25839close#26118
this will allow us to fully localize it later
PS: we can not migrate back as the old value was a one-way conversion
prepare for #25213
---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*
So I found this [linter](https://github.com/Riverside-Healthcare/djlint)
which features a mode for go templates, so I gave it a try and it did
find a number of valid issue, like unbalanced tags etc. It also has a
number of bugs, I had to disable/workaround many issues.
Given that this linter is written in python, this does add a dependency
on `python` >= 3.8 and `poetry` to the development environment to be
able to run this linter locally.
- `e.g.` prefixes on placeholders are removed because the linter had a
false-positive on `placeholder="e.g. cn=Search"` for the `attr=value`
syntax and it's not ideal anyways to write `e.g.` into a placeholder
because a placeholder is meant to hold a sample value.
- In `templates/repo/settings/options.tmpl` I simplified the logic to
not conditionally create opening tags without closing tags because this
stuff confuses the linter (and possibly the reader as well).
Fix#25133
Thanks @wxiaoguang @silverwind.
I'm sorry I made a mistake, it will be fixed in this PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/25130
The old code uses `$(this).next()` to get `dismiss-review-modal`.
At first, it will get `$(#dismiss-review-modal)`, but the next time it
will get `$(#dismiss-review-modal).next();`
and then `$(#dismiss-review-modal).next().next();`.
Because div `dismiss-review-modal` will be removed when
`dismiss-review-btn` clicked.
Maybe the right usage is adding `show-modal` class and `data-modal`
attribute.
This adds the ability to pin important Issues and Pull Requests. You can
also move pinned Issues around to change their Position. Resolves#2175.
## Screenshots
The Design was mostly copied from the Projects Board.
## Implementation
This uses a new `pin_order` Column in the `issue` table. If the value is
set to 0, the Issue is not pinned. If it's set to a bigger value, the
value is the Position. 1 means it's the first pinned Issue, 2 means it's
the second one etc. This is dived into Issues and Pull requests for each
Repo.
## TODO
- [x] You can currently pin as many Issues as you want. Maybe we should
add a Limit, which is configurable. GitHub uses 3, but I prefer 6, as
this is better for bigger Projects, but I'm open for suggestions.
- [x] Pin and Unpin events need to be added to the Issue history.
- [x] Tests
- [x] Migration
**The feature itself is currently fully working, so tester who may find
weird edge cases are very welcome!**
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
There was some recent discussion about this in Discord `ui-design`
channel and the conclusion was that
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/24305 should have fixed their
OS font installation to have semibold weights.
I have now tested this 601 weight on a Windows 10 machine on Firefox
myself, and I immediately noticed that bold was excessivly bold and
rendering as 700 because browsers are biased towards bolder fonts. So
revert this back to the previous value.
Clean up a few cases where avatar dimensions were overwritten via CSS,
which were no longer needed or were possible to set via HTML width.
Also included are two small fixes:
- Fix one more case of incorrect avatar offset on review timeline
- Vertically center avatars in review sidebar
There is more to be done here, but some of the work depends on Fomantic
`comment` module removal, or in the case of org member lists, a refactor
of the `avatarlink` template to accept a size.
<img width="371" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/115237/9c5902fb-2b89-4a7d-a152-60e74c3b2c56">
<img width="306" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/115237/c8d92e2a-91c9-4f4a-a7de-6ae1a6bc0479">
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
This refactors the `shared/datetime/short|long|full` templates into a
template helper function, which allows us to render absolute date times
within translatable phrases.
- Follows #23988
- The first attempt was in #24055
- This should help #22664
Changes:
1. Added the `DateTime` template helper that replaces the
`shared/datetime/short|long|full` templates
2. Used find-and-replace with varying regexes to replace the templates
from step 1 (for example, `\{\{template "shared/datetime/(\S+) \(dict
"Datetime" ([^"]+) "Fallback" ([^\)]+\)?) ?\)?\}\}` -> `{{DateTime "$1
$2 $3}}`)
3. Used the new `DateTime` helper in the issue due date timestamp
rendering
# Before
# After
---------
Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Follow #23328
The improvements:
1. The `contains` functions are covered by tests
2. The inconsistent behavior of `containGeneric` is replaced by
`StringUtils.Contains` and `SliceUtils.Contains`
3. In the future we can move more help functions into XxxUtils to
simplify the `helper.go` and reduce unnecessary global functions.
FAQ:
1. Why it's called `StringUtils.Contains` but not `strings.Contains`
like Golang?
Because our `StringUtils` is not Golang's `strings` package. There will
be our own string functions.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Close#24195
Some of the changes are taken from my another fix
f07b0de997
in #20147 (although that PR was discarded ....)
The bug is:
1. The old code doesn't handle `removedfile` event correctly
2. The old code doesn't provide attachments for type=CommentTypeReview
This PR doesn't intend to refactor the "upload" code to a perfect state
(to avoid making the review difficult), so some legacy styles are kept.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Close: #23738
The actual cause of `500 Internal Server Error` in the issue is not what
is descirbed in the issue.
The actual cause is that after deleting team, if there is a PR which has
requested reivew from the deleted team, the comment could not match with
the deleted team by `assgin_team_id`. So the value of `.AssigneeTeam`
(see below code block) is `nil` which cause `500 error`.
1c8bc4081a/templates/repo/issue/view_content/comments.tmpl (L691-L695)
To fix this bug, there are the following problems to be resolved:
- [x] 1. ~~Stroe the name of the team in `content` column when inserting
`comment` into DB in case that we cannot get the name of team after it
is deleted. But for comments that already exist, just display "Unknown
Team"~~ Just display "Ghost Team" in the comment if the assgined team is
deleted.
- [x] 2. Delete the PR&team binding (the row of which `review_team_id =
${team_id} ` in table `review`) when deleting team.
- [x] 3.For already exist and undeleted binding rows in in table
`review`, ~~we can delete these rows when executing migrations.~~ they
do not affect the function, so won't delete them.
