Add the FORGEJO__ prefix as equivalent to GITEA__ when interpreted by
environment-to-ini. It is used when running the Forgejo container like
so:
docker run --name forgejo -e FORGEJO__security__INSTALL_LOCK=true \
-d codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo:1.18
Signed-off-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
(cherry picked from commit 6cd61e2ab7)
(cherry picked from commit 62cae8cc6a)
(cherry picked from commit aee1afc509)
(cherry picked from commit 6ba563cd9b)
(cherry picked from commit 6429b20f4a)
(cherry picked from commit dd545aa077)
(cherry picked from commit 63a00e573e)
(cherry picked from commit 8e35a50b91)
(cherry picked from commit 26e8fb6cd9)
- "Gitea" is automatically being determined in Swagger and cannot be
overridden, therefor we override it after `swagger generate spec` is run.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/226
(cherry picked from commit 0b45380765)
[BRANDING] Change Swagger title to Forgejo API
(cherry picked from commit 79f6a70b53)
(cherry picked from commit 6cd47afe33)
(cherry picked from commit a7ae2e4c09)
(cherry picked from commit 59f837e466)
(cherry picked from commit c1c3d1f0e6)
(cherry picked from commit 4b088713fb)
(cherry picked from commit 3df1d21371)
(cherry picked from commit a4a5fdbde4)
(cherry picked from commit 57aa9ed710)
As the docs of codeberg refer to the strings printed by the Forgejo
ssh servers, this is user-facing and is nice to update to the new
product name.
(cherry picked from commit 103991d73f)
(cherry picked from commit 2a0d3f85f1)
(cherry picked from commit eb2b4ce388)
(cherry picked from commit 0998b51716)
[BRANDING] forgejo log message
(cherry picked from commit d51a046ebe)
(cherry picked from commit d66e1c7b6e)
(cherry picked from commit b5bffe4ce8)
(cherry picked from commit 3fa776d856)
(cherry picked from commit 18d064f472)
(cherry picked from commit c95094e355)
Replaces `Gitea` with `Forgejo` in the default config settings for new installs.
This will not affect existing installs.
Co-authored-by: Caesar Schinas <caesar@caesarschinas.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/140
Co-authored-by: Caesar Schinas <caesar@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Caesar Schinas <caesar@noreply.codeberg.org>
(cherry picked from commit ca1319aa16)
(cherry picked from commit 52a4d238a0)
(cherry picked from commit f63536538c)
Conflicts:
web_src/js/features/install.js
(cherry picked from commit 861cc434e1)
(cherry picked from commit 0e6ea60c80)
(cherry picked from commit 0cbc0ec15d)
(cherry picked from commit 3cc19b0ae2)
(cherry picked from commit 50fcb885fe)
(cherry picked from commit f6039d4df4)
- We can rebrand this quite safely, as only new installations would likely look into this file and configure the correct folders(to use forgejo instead of gitea).
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/137
(cherry picked from commit fa78e52b5d)
(cherry picked from commit e36d649989)
(cherry picked from commit 37e15a2f41)
(cherry picked from commit a09a4b3ce0)
(cherry picked from commit 3096b37c95)
(cherry picked from commit 187ad96c94)
(cherry picked from commit e15eb31c6e)
(cherry picked from commit e276abe341)
(cherry picked from commit 31223db5e3)
(cherry picked from commit 20b5669269)
(cherry picked from commit 1574643a6a)
Update semantic version according to specification
(cherry picked from commit 22510f4130)
Mise à jour de 'Makefile'
(cherry picked from commit c3d85d8409)
(cherry picked from commit 5ea2309851)
(cherry picked from commit ec5217b9d1)
(cherry picked from commit 14f08e364b)
(cherry picked from commit b4465c67b8)
[API] [SEMVER] replace number with version
(cherry picked from commit fba48e6497)
(cherry picked from commit 532ec5d878)
[API] [SEMVER] [v1.20] less is replaced by css
(cherry picked from commit 01ca3a4f42)
(cherry picked from commit 1d928c3ab2)
(cherry picked from commit a39dc804cd)
Conflicts:
webpack.config.js
(cherry picked from commit adc68578b3)
(cherry picked from commit 9dd224f00c)
(cherry picked from commit 710af007bc)
(cherry picked from commit 2ccd6e2bd6)
(cherry picked from commit b90dc5fc4f)
(cherry picked from commit bf25d98a98)
(cherry picked from commit d7c71e5985)
[WORKFLOW] Add Forgejo Next and reproducing to issue template
(cherry picked from commit 17a3988fe0)
(cherry picked from commit 9ee5b3a619)
(cherry picked from commit bebdd8d5f3)
(cherry picked from commit be7bb96d5c)
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/8
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/153
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/123
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/299
(cherry picked from commit 08dcef0c8c)
[DOCS] CONTRIBUTING/RELEASE: https://forgejo.org/docs/admin
Because the version is not displayed on the landing page of Forgejo,
there cannot be a link to a versionned documentation. There must exist
a link that points to the latest version on the website for the
forgejo instance to display.
Better but more complicated approaches could be to:
* Embed the documentation in Forgejo
* Allow the admin to not display the help
* Allow the admin to display a versionned help or not
(cherry picked from commit 83cc389239)
(cherry picked from commit 5df52b8a4f)
(cherry picked from commit 9a66b3d70b)
[DOCS] CONTRIBUTING/RELEASE: reminder to update FORGEJO_VERSION
(cherry picked from commit 2a4d0bd164)
(cherry picked from commit d68576ba67)
[DOCS] CONTRIBUTING: updates
* Remove obsolete description of the well being & moderation team and
replace them with a link to the moderation email.
* Remove description of the governance process and replace with a link
to the governance readme that did not exist at the time.
* Add links to the Forgejo documentation
(cherry picked from commit df749da272)
(cherry picked from commit 4da39128c5)
(cherry picked from commit f442ca6f40)
(cherry picked from commit 031928c447)
Although it would be possible to modify these files, it would create
conflicts when rebasing. Instead, this commit removes them entirely
and another commit can start from scratch, borrowing content from the
original files.
The drawback of this approach is that some content updates from Gitea
that also need updating in Forgejo will have to be copy/pasted
instead of being merged.
(cherry picked from commit eb85782115)
(cherry picked from commit 34401f2004)
(cherry picked from commit ef43b1c691)
(cherry picked from commit d17fe25e2f)
(cherry picked from commit 3f65dea3e7)
(cherry picked from commit 3cacb64a1b)
(cherry picked from commit b531b014b7)
(cherry picked from commit adf6e7a840)
(cherry picked from commit 68c19d977d)
f92e0a4018 added minio to the tests/pgsql.ini.tmpl and Forgejo CI does
not run a minio server. It will if there are external storage related
changes at some point but it is not the case now so it is not worth
the burden.
(cherry picked from commit 4cfbf4718d)
(cherry picked from commit 9bd644d601)
(cherry picked from commit 604636c7c4)
(cherry picked from commit 341cdb8540)
(cherry picked from commit 57bdc91de5)
Before, there was a `log/buffer.go`, but that design is not general, and
it introduces a lot of irrelevant `Content() (string, error) ` and
`return "", fmt.Errorf("not supported")` .
And the old `log/buffer.go` is difficult to use, developers have to
write a lot of `Contains` and `Sleep` code.
The new `LogChecker` is designed to be a general approach to help to
assert some messages appearing or not appearing in logs.
Users can now upload `webp` images.
Browsers supporting webp images then display this as the avatar of this
user (every major browser except IE).
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Two small CSS fixes:
1. Fix basic primary label hover
2. Fix border color of divider in dropdown and remove margin so it looks
better with hover effect, as discussed in
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24143:
The old code is unnecessarily complex, and has many misuses.
Old code "wraps" a lot, wrap wrap wrap, it's difficult to understand
which kind of handler is used.
The new code uses a general approach, we do not need to write all kinds
of handlers into the "wrapper", do not need to wrap them again and
again.
New code, there are only 2 concepts:
1. HandlerProvider: `func (h any) (handlerProvider func (next)
http.Handler)`, it can be used as middleware
2. Use HandlerProvider to get the final HandlerFunc, and use it for
`r.Get()`
And we can decouple the route package from context package (see the
TODO).
# FAQ
## Is `reflect` safe?
Yes, all handlers are checked during startup, see the `preCheckHandler`
comment. If any handler is wrong, developers could know it in the first
time.
## Does `reflect` affect performance?
No. https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24080#discussion_r1164825901
1. This reflect code only runs for each web handler call, handler is far
more slower: 10ms-50ms
2. The reflect is pretty fast (comparing to other code): 0.000265ms
3. XORM has more reflect operations already
Close#24108
Use secondary pointing menu for tabs on user/organization home page so
the tabs look the same.
Main changes:
1. modified a part of dom structure in
`templates/user/overview/header.tmpl` to make it the same as
`templates/org/header.tmpl` in order to produce the same ui.
2. Move some css to `web_src/css/shared/repoorgshared.css` to make them
shareable between `templates/user/overview/header.tmpl` and
`templates/org/header.tmpl`
After:
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17645053/232400617-2add5bec-d483-4ab1-b48d-eaee157f7b09.mov
For further improvements. Need some thoughts:
For [this
TODO](729ad294cb/templates/user/overview/header.tmpl (L1)),
it is viable to make it a shared template for [this
part](729ad294cb/templates/user/overview/header.tmpl (L2-L17))
and [this
part](729ad294cb/templates/org/header.tmpl (L1-L16))
because they are the same except for the variable. But for the menu
parts, they are quite different so might not be suitable to use a shared
template. So need some thoughts and advice about extracting the shared
template from these two headers.
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
# Background
Golang template is not friendly for large projects, and Golang template
team is quite slow, related:
* `https://github.com/golang/go/issues/54450`
Without upstream support, we can also have our solution to make HTML
template functions support context.
It helps a lot, the above Golang template issue `#54450` explains a lot:
1. It makes `{{Locale.Tr}}` could be used in any template, without
passing unclear `(dict "root" . )` anymore.
2. More and more functions need `context`, like `avatar`, etc, we do not
need to do `(dict "Context" $.Context)` anymore.
3. Many request-related functions could be shared by parent&children
templates, like "user setting" / "system setting"
See the test `TestScopedTemplateSetFuncMap`, one template set, two
`Execute` calls with different `CtxFunc`.
# The Solution
Instead of waiting for upstream, this PR re-uses the escaped HTML
template trees, use `AddParseTree` to add related templates/trees to a
new template instance, then the new template instance can have its own
FuncMap , the function calls in the template trees will always use the
new template's FuncMap.
`template.New` / `template.AddParseTree` / `adding-FuncMap` are all
quite fast, so the performance is not affected.
The details:
1. Make a new `html/template/Template` for `all` templates
2. Add template code to the `all` template
3. Freeze the `all` template, reset its exec func map, it shouldn't
execute any template.
4. When a router wants to render a template by its `name`
1. Find the `name` in `all`
2. Find all its related sub templates
3. Escape all related templates (just like what the html template
package does)
4. Add the escaped parse-trees of related templates into a new (scoped)
`text/template/Template`
5. Add context-related func map into the new (scoped) text template
6. Execute the new (scoped) text template
7. To improve performance, the escaped templates are cached to `template
sets`
# FAQ
## There is a `unsafe` call, is this PR unsafe?
This PR is safe. Golang has strict language definition, it's safe to do
so: https://pkg.go.dev/unsafe#Pointer (1) Conversion of a *T1 to Pointer
to *T2
## What if Golang template supports such feature in the future?
The public structs/interfaces/functions introduced by this PR is quite
simple, the code of `HTMLRender` is not changed too much. It's very easy
to switch to the official mechanism if there would be one.
## Does this PR change the template execution behavior?
No, see the tests (welcome to design more tests if it's necessary)
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Close#24195
Some of the changes are taken from my another fix
f07b0de997
in #20147 (although that PR was discarded ....)
The bug is:
1. The old code doesn't handle `removedfile` event correctly
2. The old code doesn't provide attachments for type=CommentTypeReview
This PR doesn't intend to refactor the "upload" code to a perfect state
(to avoid making the review difficult), so some legacy styles are kept.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
